* Assert premium features for some middleware
* Fix an existing bug
These tests started failing here, which revealed that they formerly
never actually were testing what they thought they were.
A few reasons:
- they turned on `advanced-permissions` feature by itself, so sandboxing
was always off here
- they set up sandboxing in a nonstandard way
- one had a typo so we weren't even wrapping the body with
`with-download-perms!` (it was a separate block entirely)
This hid the bug that some of the tests were intended to reproduce - if
a card used for sandboxing had a native query, then we required that you
have download permissions on the entire database, which is wrong.
* fix test
* make assertions with/without tokens for sandboxing
* Add comments about why `:feature :none`
* Update enterprise/backend/test/metabase_enterprise/sandbox/query_processor/middleware/sandboxing_test.clj
Co-authored-by: Cam Saul <1455846+camsaul@users.noreply.github.com>
* add a nicer docstring and change fn name
replace `any-native-unsandboxed-stage?` with
`any-native-stage-not-introduced-by-sandbox?`
* Block without feature enabled
* CR response
---------
Co-authored-by: Cam Saul <1455846+camsaul@users.noreply.github.com>
8dc5cec918